Hearing Loss Prevention (Noise)
Chapter 296-817, WAC
|
Effective Date:
08/01/03 |
Contents Helpful
Tools Index Download
| Chapter
296-817 WAC
Helpful Tool: Noise Computation Examples |
|
This helpful tool gives you examples of noise
computations that should assist you with your own computations.
Also found in this helpful tool are examples of employer actions
based on the specific noise computation results. You’ll
need to do your own noise computations and determine the specific
actions needed based on the noise exposures in your workplace.
EXAMPLE 1
Assume an employee is exposed to 92 dBA for
eight hours. Compute the employee’s noise exposure, the
time-weighted average and what action, if any, would be required
of the employer.
Exposure:
The exposure time is 8 hours. The reference
duration for 92 dBA is 6 hours.

Time-weighted Average (TWA):
In Table HT-2,
find the values for 130% and 135%. The difference in the time-weighted
average values (92.2 - 91.6) equals 0.6. Since 133% is 3/5 of
the way between 130 and 135, 133% equals 3/5 (0.6) + 91.6 = 92
dBA.
Employer Action:
Since the employee’s exposure is above
the 90 dBA TWA8, the employer would be
required to institute a full hearing loss prevention program,
including:
- Controlling noise as feasible,
- Providing hearing protection and training
for employees,
AND
- Instituting an audiometric testing
program.
EXAMPLE 2
Assume a continuous noise exposure for an
employee of 90 dBA and a work shift of 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. with
a 15-minute morning and afternoon break and a 30-minute lunch.
Both breaks and lunch are in an area with less than 70 dBA exposure.
(Although this exposure could be integrated into the employee’s
total noise exposure, it is not significant and will not be considered
in these calculations.) Calculate the worker’s exposure,
TWA, and the employer’s responsibility.
Exposure:
Actual exposure (subtracting the lunch
time and work breaks from the employee’s work shift) indicates
a 90 dBA exposure for 7 ½ hours. D = 100 (C1/T1)
= 100 (7.5/8) = 94 (94%)

Time-weighted Average (TWA):
From Table HT-2 a noise
exposure of 94% converts to an equivalent 8-hour time-weighted
average of 89.6 dBA.
Employer Action:
Since the employee’s time-weighted
average is between 85 and 90 dBA TWA8,
a hearing loss prevention program must be developed and maintained
for the employee including hearing protection, training and
audiometric testing. Engineering and/or administrative controls
are not required, but may be beneficial, since the hearing loss
prevention program would no longer be required if the employee’s
exposure were reduced below 85 dBA TWA8.
EXAMPLE 3
Assume a technician works in a noise enclosure
booth with a noise exposure of less than 70 dBA. The technician
makes rounds to read gauges and instruments that are located in
an area with a noise level of 105 dBA. The technician makes four
trips a day, and each trip lasts 30 minutes. Calculate the employee’s
noise exposure, TWA and employer’s responsibility.
Exposure:
With four trips a day and 30 minutes per
trip, the employee is basically exposed to two hours of noise
at 105 dBA with the remaining time spent inside the booth. From
Table HT-1 of the rule the reference duration
for exposure at 105 dBA is 1 hour.

Time-weighted Average:
The employee’s TWA from Table
HT- 2 is 95 dBA.
Employer Action:
Since the employee’s exposure is
above the 90 dBA TWA8, the employer would
be required to institute a full hearing loss prevention program,
including controlling noise as feasible, providing hearing protection
and training for employees, and instituting an audiometric testing
program.
EXAMPLE 4
Assume a timber trimsaw operator with a background
noise level inside the operator’s booth of 85 Dba, cuts
one timber every 10 seconds with a noise exposure during the cut
of 105 Dba for three seconds. The employee works from 6 a.m. to
4:30 p.m. and has a 15-minute break in the morning and the afternoon
and a 30-minute lunch break, all of which are below 70 Dba. Calculate
the employee’s noise exposure and TWA.
Exposure:
First sound level - 105 dBA
The employee is exposed to this sound level
for three seconds out of every ten or 30% of the time. Thus
the time of exposure (C1) at this level
is 0.3 x 9.5 or 2.85 hours. From Table HT- 1,
the reference duration (T1) is one hour.
Second sound level - 85 dBA
The employee is exposed to this sound level
for seven seconds out of every ten or 70% of the time. Thus
the time of exposure (C2) at this level
is 0.7 x 9.5 or 6.65 hours. From Table HT-1,
the reference duration (T2) is sixteen
hours.

Time-weighted Average (TWA):
From the conversion table we find a noise
dose of 327% lies between 320 and 330 with values of 98.4 dBA
and 98.6 dBA respectively.
320% = 98.4 dBA
330% = 98.6 dBA
327% = (7/10)*(0.2) + 98.4 = 98.5
EXAMPLE 5
Assume a security guard works an eight-hour
shift and makes eight rounds a night. In making a round of the
facility the guard will spend 20 minutes in Building A, 30 minutes
in Building B and 10 minutes in the yard. In Building A the noise
levels are less than 70 dBA. Noise level in the yard is 85 dBA.
In Building B there is a cyclic machine operation where the noise
levels are:
100 dBA for 3 seconds (30%),
95 dBA for 3 seconds (30%) and
90 dBA for 4 seconds (40%);
Calculate the employee’s noise exposure
and time-weighted average (TWA).
Since the employee’s noise exposure
in Building A is less than 70 dBA, this exposure is not significant
and will not enter into the computation (the theoretical dose
would be less than 2%). In Building B we find three noise exposures,
100, 95, and 90 dBA respectively. The yard also has an exposure
(85 dBA), which will enter into the total computation.
Calculating the partial exposures at each
noise level we find:
At 100 dBA

At 95 dBA

At 90 dBA

The yard at 85 dBA

The employee’s total noise exposure
can be calculated from the noise exposure formula using the following
values.
| Location
|
Sound
Level |
Time
of Exposure |
Reference
Duration |
| Building B |
100 dBA |
C1 = 1.2 hours |
T1 = 2 hours |
| Building B |
95 dBA |
C2 = 1.2 hours |
T2 = 4 hours |
| Building B |
90 dBA |
C3 = 1.6 hours |
T3 = 8 hours |
| Yard |
85 dBA |
C4 = 1.33 hours |
T4 = 16 hours |
The employee’s total noise exposure
(D) is computed as follows:

| Table
HT-1
Reference Durations, in Hours, for
given Noise Levels |
| Noise
Level, L |
Reference
Duration, T |
|
Noise
Level, L |
Reference
Duration, T |
| 80 |
32.0 |
106 |
0.87 |
| 81 |
27.9 |
107
|
0.76 |
| 82 |
24.3 |
108 |
0.66 |
| 83 |
21.1 |
109 |
0.57 |
| 84 |
18.4 |
110 |
0.50 |
| 85 |
16.0 |
111 |
0.44 |
| 86 |
13.9 |
112 |
0.38 |
| 87 |
12.1 |
113 |
0.33 |
| 88 |
10.6 |
114 |
0.29 |
| 89 |
9.2 |
115 |
0.25 |
| 90 |
8.0 |
116 |
0.22 |
| 91 |
7.0 |
117 |
0.19 |
| 92 |
6.1 |
118 |
0.16 |
| 93 |
5.3 |
119 |
0.14 |
| 94 |
4.6 |
120 |
0.13 |
| 95 |
4.0 |
121 |
0.11 |
| 96 |
3.5 |
122 |
0.095 |
| 97 |
3.0 |
123 |
0.082 |
| 98 |
2.6 |
124 |
0.072 |
| 99 |
2.3 |
125 |
0.063 |
| 100 |
2.0 |
126 |
0.054 |
| 101 |
1.7 |
127 |
0.047 |
| 102 |
1.5 |
128 |
0.041 |
| 103 |
1.3 |
129 |
0.036 |
| 104 |
1.1 |
130 |
0.031 |
| 105 |
1.0 |
131 |
0.027 |
| Table HT-2
Dose to Equivalent TWA8 for Given
Dose |
| Dose |
TWA8 |
|
Dose |
TWA8
|
|
Dose |
TWA8 |
| 10 |
<=70 |
350 |
99.0 |
670 |
103.7 |
| 20 |
78.4 |
360 |
99.2 |
680 |
103.8 |
| 30 |
81.3 |
370 |
99.4 |
690 |
103.9 |
| 40 |
83.4 |
380 |
99.6 |
700 |
104.0 |
| 50 |
85.0 |
390 |
99.8 |
710 |
104.1 |
| 60 |
86.3 |
400 |
100.0 |
720 |
104.2 |
| 70 |
87.4 |
410 |
100.2 |
730 |
104.3 |
| 80 |
88.4 |
420 |
100.4 |
740 |
104.4 |
| 90 |
89.2 |
430 |
100.5 |
750 |
104.5 |
| 100 |
90.0 |
440 |
100.7 |
760 |
104.6 |
| 110 |
90.7 |
450 |
100.8 |
770 |
104.7 |
| 120 |
91.3 |
460 |
101.0 |
780 |
104.8 |
| 130 |
91.9 |
470 |
101.2 |
790 |
104.9 |
| 140 |
92.4 |
480 |
101.3 |
800 |
105.0 |
| 150 |
92.9 |
490 |
101.5 |
810 |
105.1 |
| 160 |
93.4 |
500 |
101.6 |
820 |
105.2 |
| 170 |
93.8 |
510 |
101.8 |
830 |
105.3 |
| 180 |
94.2 |
520 |
101.9 |
840 |
105.4 |
| 190 |
94.6 |
530 |
102.0 |
850 |
105.4 |
| 200 |
95.0 |
540 |
102.2 |
860 |
105.5 |
| 210 |
95.4 |
550 |
102.3 |
870 |
105.6 |
| 220 |
95.7 |
560 |
102.4 |
880 |
105.7 |
| 230 |
96.0 |
570 |
102.6 |
890 |
105.8 |
| 240 |
96.3 |
580 |
102.7 |
900 |
105.8 |
| 250 |
96.6 |
590 |
102.8 |
910 |
105.9 |
| 260 |
96.9 |
600 |
102.9 |
920 |
106.0 |
| 270 |
97.2 |
610 |
103.0 |
930 |
106.1 |
| 280 |
97.4 |
620 |
103.2 |
940 |
106.2 |
| 290 |
97.7 |
630 |
103.3 |
950 |
106.2 |
| 300 |
97.9 |
640 |
103.4 |
960 |
106.3 |
| 310 |
98.2 |
650 |
103.5 |
970 |
106.4 |
| 320 |
98.4 |
660 |
103.6 |
980 |
106.5 |
| 330 |
98.6 |
670 |
103.7 |
990 |
106.5 |
| 340 |
98.8 |
680 |
103.8 |
1000 |
106.6 |
SUMMARY
As you can see, the more variable the noise
sources or exposure times, the more involved the computations
become. Noise dosimeters overcome this problem by electronically
accumulating and integrating the noise signals into the employee’s
noise dose. Having one person observe several noise dosimeters
can save additional time. However, a simultaneous survey using
a sound level meter must be conducted to support the dosimeter
results.
back
to top
|